Metros with the Most Construction Permits in 2011
- Houston, TX – 31,271
- Dallas, TX – 18,686
- Washington, DC – 16,501
- New York, NY – 13,973
- Austin, TX – 10,239
- Los Angeles, CA – 9,895
- Phoenix, AZ – 9,081
- Seattle, WA – 8,664
- Atlanta, GA – 8,634
- San Antonio, TX – 7,127
More permits were issued in the Houston metro area than in any other metro, by far. Four of the top ten metros were in Texas. But this list is dominated by large metro areas, and we’d expect bigger areas to have more construction activity. Looking instead at the number of permits issued per 1,000 existing housing units…here are the top metro areas by construction activity:
Most Construction Activity (per 1,000 existing units)
- El Paso, TX – 15.36
- Austin, TX – 14.49
- Raleigh, NC – 13.66
- Houston, TX – 13.55
- Charleston, SC – 12.80
- Dallas, TX – 11.26
- Little Rock, AR – 10.53
- Baton Rouge, LA – 9.51
- Washington, DC – 9.44
- Columbia, SC – 8.74
via – The Top U.S. Cities for New Home Construction – which includes cities with least construction activity
March 2, 2012 – Southern California Edison (SCE) continues to perform extensive testing and inspections of the steam generators at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station.
“Nuclear safety is our top priority,” said Pete Dietrich, SCE senior vice president and chief nuclear officer. “Everything we do — from normal plant operations and routine refueling…”
I don’t want to be controversial, but this is starting to sound like a delay tactic. The leaking nuclear steam turbine was taken offline over two months ago with an investigation to follow. The initial word was that a report would be issued “the following week.”
After that deadline passed a few newspapers reported the delay. Then, Barbara Boxer, California’s Senator, issued a concerned letter and so did the local city council.
Still no results from the investigation.
Even the local newspapers, with readers in the fallout zone, have stopped reporting on it. The issue seems to be sliding into the rear view mirror, and perhaps that’s the way Edison wants it.
The leak has become much more serious than initially reported. Our local journalists (at the LA Times, OC Register, and San Diego UT) did us a disservice by simply reporting what Edison told them: the leak was tiny, no safety issues were posed, and Edison is doing everything right.
A line they still stick to (when they do cover it).
My own investigations turned up something different. First, the report to the NRC said that the first unit leaked up to 82 gallons/day of radioactive steam. Second, the sister unit had upwards of 1,000 pipes showing radiation damage. Third, there was another incident back in November with an ammonia leak.
Yeah, nothing to worry about here, Edison has it all under control. Two reactors turned off, one leaking, radiation damage, and ammonia problems.
It doesn’t help that Edison is purposely ambiguous in their statements. The only significant piece of information in the latest press release (linked above) is that some of the 1,000 pipes have been “plugged”. Which begs the question, were they leaking?
I understand these things are complicated but the longer the issue drags on the worse it seems to get. Edison isn’t becoming any more honest in their dealings with the public. The newspapers are continuing their anti-journalistic approach.
I have to wonder if the approach is to delay, wait until any public interest dies down, and then handle it their own way.